Field Test · Studio Gear Review
Roland RH-200
Test & review: Roland
Roland
- Headphones
- This is what customers who viewed this product bought
- Accessories & matching items
- 14Customer ratings
- Compare options
- Smart Navigator
Spec Sheet
- Closed-back
- 180 Degrees swivel ear cups
- 40 mm Driver
- Neodymium magnet
- “Copper-Clad Aluminium Wire” coils
- Sound pressure level: 100 dB
- Impedance: 65 Ohm
- Frequency range: 20 – 20,000 Hz
- 3 m Cable with strain relief
- Stereo mini jack with 6.3 mm adapter
- Weight with cable: 278 g
- Weight without cable: 200 g
Studio Log
| Available since | February 2005 |
|---|---|
| Item number | 177644 |
| Sales Unit | 1 piece(s) |
| Design | Over-Ear |
| System | CLosed Back |
| Impedance | 65 Ohms |
| Frequency range | 20 Hz – 20000 Hz |
| Adapter | Yes |
| Replacable Cable | No |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB |
| Type Of Connector | Jack, Mini-Jack |
| Weight | 200 g |
Demo Footage
Field Photography
QC Pass — Field Test
Customer Review Summary
[SUBTITLE]A technical appraisal of Roland’s RH-200 closed-back headphones
Introduction to the Roland RH-200
Released in early 2005, the Roland RH-200 is a closed-back, over-ear headphone designed primarily for use with electronic musical instruments, notably stage pianos and drum modules. Priced around £84, this model has become a recognizable option in studios and live environments where accurate sound representation is needed. Its key specifications include a 65 Ohm impedance, a frequency response from 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz, and a sensitivity of 100 dB.
Design and Build Quality
The RH-200 features a closed-back design that effectively isolates external noise, crucial in live recording and noisy environments. The ear cups swivel up to 180 degrees, enhancing comfort and portability. Weighing 200 grams without the cable, and 278 grams overall, the headphones strike a balance between sturdiness and wearability.
The headphones use 40 mm drivers equipped with neodymium magnets and copper-clad aluminium wire coils, contributing to their sound clarity and efficiency. The attached 3-metre cable includes strain relief and terminates in a stereo mini-jack with a 6.3 mm adapter, providing versatility in connection to various instruments and audio equipment. However, the cable is not replaceable, which could be a drawback for long-term maintenance.
Comfort and Fit
While over-ear in design, user feedback points to some discomfort during extended sessions, with the ear cushions exerting pressure that can cause irritation around the earlobes. The ear padding material has shown signs of wear over time, with complaints regarding the degradation of the fabric covering. This aspect may compromise prolonged use comfort, especially in professional situations requiring hours of monitoring or mixing.
Sound Performance
The Roland RH-200 is generally praised for its rich and clear sound profile. The balanced frequency response ensures fullness in the lower ranges without overpowering bass, making it suitable for detailed listening and mastering. Users noted the headphones reveal recording imperfections clearly, which is essential for audio engineers and musicians aiming for high fidelity.
Some reviewers found the sound slightly dry compared to other models, though this dryness aids in exposing recording defects. The headphones reproduce the mid and high frequencies with clarity but avoid harshness, yielding a pleasant but precise listening experience. Despite positive comments on sound quality, a few users noted that the RH-200 was less successful as a monitoring solution for electronic drum modules, where the tonal balance appeared thin and unconvincing.
Isolation and Practical Use
The closed-back design provides effective isolation from ambient noise, vital for on-location recording and stage monitoring. This feature also facilitates late-night practice or mixing sessions without disturbing others, cited by several users as a practical advantage.
Durability and Maintenance
Over the years, some users have reported issues such as crackling sounds appearing at specific frequencies, indicating potential durability concerns. Additionally, obtaining replacement ear pads has become difficult, as Roland has reduced consumer support for spare parts. This makes maintenance less straightforward and might encourage users to consider other options when replacements are needed.
Comparison and Value
When compared to its sibling model, the RH-5, which is £60 cheaper and nearly identical save for its fully black plastic design, the RH-200 is often seen as less competitive regarding sound quality. The RH-5 reportedly offers a superior audio experience at a lower price, making the premium of the RH-200 less justifiable, except for the slightly improved comfort cited by some users.
Still, the RH-200 remains a solid choice for those who prioritise a sturdy build with a focused design for electronic instruments and require a straightforward solution for sound isolation and detailed monitoring.
Conclusion
The Roland RH-200 headphone delivers clear, balanced sound from a closed-back, over-ear package suitable for music production, electronic instrument monitoring and live recording scenarios. While the sound quality is generally well regarded for its detail and clarity, minor flaws in comfort and long-term durability prevent it from excelling without reservations. Its non-replaceable cable and ageing ear cushion fabric also limit practicality over time.
For users seeking reliability in a mid-range headphone specifically tailored for electronic instruments, the RH-200 can remain a practical option provided expectations around comfort and maintenance are managed. However, potential buyers are advised to consider newer models or alternatives like the RH-5 for enhanced value and durability.
